Clarification on Boris' proposal to clarify datatype map definition conformance from Evan Wallace on 2009-07-01 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from July 2009)

From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:16:42 -0400
To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4A4B7DDA.8020104@cme.nist.gov>

OWL WG,

The email from Boris [1] that floated a proposal to put more restrictive 
language into the
syntax document also suggested removing note 2 in 2.1.1 of the 
conformance document
as well as the entirety of section 2.2.  It would be nice to have the 
difference between
OWL 2 DL ontology document conformance and OWL 2 tool conformance (where 
additional
datatypes support is permitted) continue to be highlighted like this 
somewhere in our documents.

-Evan

Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
NIST

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Apr/0454.html

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 15:17:35 UTC