public-owl-wg@w3.org from January 2009 by date

Saturday, 31 January 2009

• Re: ACTION-277 complete Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-277 complete Christine Golbreich

Friday, 30 January 2009

• RE: Column Affected documents Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Jim Hendler
• Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere Bijan Parsia
• Re: Column Affected documents Bijan Parsia
• Re: Column Affected documents Ian Horrocks
• ACTION-277 complete Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-268 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Column Affected documents Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 29 January 2009

• Re: First LC response sent Ian Horrocks
• Re: Minutes from 28 Jan Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Christine Golbreich
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft Ivan Herman
• First LC response sent Bijan Parsia
• Minutes from 28 Jan Martin Dzbor
• ACTION-274: first draft Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Ivan Herman
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Ivan Herman
• ACTION-276 completed Bijan Parsia
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

• RE: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Michael Schneider
• Column Affected documents Christine Golbreich
• Conformance text for Unicode etc. Bijan Parsia
• Re: Ontology header is a requirement - inconsistent with resolution of ISSUE-135? Mike Smith
• Normative vs. Informative references Bijan Parsia
• RDF Bug report sent (tracking with ACTION-267) Bijan Parsia
• RE: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Michael Schneider
• Re: complete minutes of 14 Jan Achille Fokoue
• Re: Action-269 Christine Golbreich
• Action-269 Evan Wallace
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda TC 21/01/2009 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: disjointness of numerics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: profiles and the rec track Bijan Parsia
• Re: profiles and the rec track Jim Hendler
• Re: disjointness of numerics Bijan Parsia
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: disjointness of numerics Ian Horrocks
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Mike Smith
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Ivan Herman
• RE: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Michael Schneider
• SHORT VERSION (Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format) Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Ivan Herman
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Jonathan Rees
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Michael Schneider
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Michael Schneider
• GRDDL Security Considerations ( was Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format) Bijan Parsia
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC Michael Schneider
• Re: tiny editorial comment Ian Horrocks
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Ian Horrocks
• More OWL EL implementations Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

• Re: profiles and the rec track Bijan Parsia
• Re: profiles and the rec track Jim Hendler
• Re: profiles and the rec track Bijan Parsia
• Re: profiles and the rec track Bijan Parsia
• Re: profiles and the rec track Jim Hendler
• Agenda TC 28/01/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Ontology header is a requirement - inconsistent with resolution of ISSUE-135? Mike Smith
• Re: profiles and the rec track Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Jonathan Rees
• profiles and the rec track Jim Hendler
• Stuff on swig list Bijan Parsia
• RE: OWL 2 Slide Presentation Pathak, Jyotishman, Ph.D.
• Re: LC: FH6 Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: FH6 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: LC: FH6 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Ivan Herman
• LC: FH6 Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation Christine Golbreich
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation Ian Horrocks

Monday, 26 January 2009

• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? Jie Bao
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation Bijan Parsia
• OWL 2 Slide Presentation Pathak, Jyotishman, Ph.D.
• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? Bijan Parsia
• LC: SS1 Bijan Parsia
• Can an object property be both functional and transitive? Jie Bao
• LC: Opposing OWL/XML format Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC Comment: Names for axioms Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 25 January 2009

• RE: LC Comment: Names for axioms Michael Schneider
• Minutes of 2009-02-21 Jie Bao

Saturday, 24 January 2009

• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Vojtech Svatek

Friday, 23 January 2009

• Re: XML Schema for OWL/XML Bijan Parsia
• Re: XML Schema for OWL/XML Bijan Parsia
• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Bijan Parsia
• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Solbrig, Harold R.
• XML Schema for OWL/XML Bijan Parsia
• Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Bijan Parsia
• LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms Bijan Parsia
• LC Comment: Names for axioms Bijan Parsia
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Zhe Wu
• Re: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) Bijan Parsia
• RE: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) Ivan Herman
• Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE Ivan Herman
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Ivan Herman
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Bijan Parsia
• RE: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Boris Motik
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE Ivan Herman
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Ivan Herman

Thursday, 22 January 2009

• RE: OWL 2 LC Comments Michael Schneider
• RE: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Boris Motik
• A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL Boris Motik
• OWL 2 LC Comments Zhe Wu
• "A" vs. "the" Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE Ivan Herman
• RE: ACTION-265 DONE Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-268 Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 21 January 2009

• Re: ACTION-268 Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-268 Christine Golbreich
• Re: ACTION-265 DONE Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-268 Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-268 Christine Golbreich
• RE: ACTION-265 DONE Michael Schneider
• ACTION-267 DONE Bijan Parsia
• ACTION-265 DONE Bijan Parsia
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases Alan Ruttenberg
• ACTION-268 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases Bijan Parsia
• Re: disjointness of numerics Bijan Parsia
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases Bijan Parsia
• RE: disjointness of numerics Michael Schneider
• Re: disjointness of numerics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• disjointness of numerics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases Alan Ruttenberg
• Better support for "looking at" test cases Markus Krötzsch
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Boris Motik
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

• Re: Requirements document? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Requirements document? Carsten Lutz
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Michael Schneider
• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Zhe Wu
• Agenda TC 21/01/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Requirements document? Bijan Parsia
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Boris Motik
• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Ivan Herman

Monday, 19 January 2009

• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Bijan Parsia
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics Michael Schneider
• A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 Boris Motik
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics Michael Schneider
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics Boris Motik
• Internal WG comments during LC period Ian Horrocks
• Re: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics Ian Horrocks
• RE: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 17 January 2009

• RE: [CURIE Syntax 1.0 is a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)] Michael Schneider
• FYI: [CURIE Syntax 1.0 is a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)] Ivan Herman

Friday, 16 January 2009

• RE: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment Michael Schneider
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document Michael Schneider
• Re: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document Mike Smith
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document Michael Schneider
• Re: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment Ivan Herman

Thursday, 15 January 2009

• Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. Zhe Wu
• Re: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document Boris Motik
• The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document Mike Smith
• Re: Trouble with IRC Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

• RE: Trouble with IRC Luciano, Joanne S.
• Re: Trouble with IRC Ivan Herman
• Trouble with IRC Luciano, Joanne S.
• An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment Boris Motik
• Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text Jie Bao

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

• Agenda TC 14/01/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina

Friday, 9 January 2009

• missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics Michael Schneider
• Additional examples to the syntax? Ivan Herman
• Posting internal comments to public-owl-comments list Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 8 January 2009

• WebOnt's RDF structure sharing test cases Mike Smith
• List of tests that were approved at 2009-01-07 telecon Mike Smith
• tiny editorial comment Ivan Herman
• Fwd: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml" Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

• Re: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) Michael Schneider
• Re: WebOnt DL Test Cases ready Markus Krötzsch
• ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for teleconference 2009.01.07 Achille Fokoue
• Re: WebOnt DL Test Cases ready Ian Horrocks
• XML Schema datatype for OWL version of date/time (ACTION-252) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Michael Schneider
• RE: Discussion of WebOnt test I4.6-005 Michael Schneider
• Primer et al Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

• Agenda for teleconference 2009.01.07 Ian Horrocks
• WebOnt Issue Test Cases ready Mike Smith
• Draft minutes from 17 December OWL WG telecon Evan Wallace

Monday, 5 January 2009

• WebOnt DL Test Cases ready Mike Smith
• Discussion of WebOnt test I4.6-005 Mike Smith

Thursday, 1 January 2009

• F2F5: ESTA travel authorization Michael Schneider

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 09:50:43 UTC