- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:13 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I will fix QRG today Jie On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > >> I'm aware that there have been several last minute reviews and that >> document editors have been responding to these by continuing to >> update the documents in the wiki. I'm very grateful for the effort >> that has gone into this and the resulting improvement in the quality >> of the spec. However, we now need to stop changing the documents so >> that we can complete a final validation and link check and create the >> HTML snapshots. Can editors therefore please conclude any in-progress >> editorial work *now* and refrain from making any more changes until >> further notice -- other than those needed to fix structural problems >> identified by the above mentioned validation and link checks. > > There are new preview snapshots linked from here: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-overview-20090416/ > > and copies of me running checklinks on them here: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks > > Everything looks fine to me except: > > NFR is reported as having some broken links, but this must be > due to a bug in the checker, since the links seem fine to me > > QRG has about 20 broken links to Primer and NFR. Running the > checker on the wiki page erroneously reports about 100 broken > links, but I think these ones really are broken: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks/checklinks-110-owl2-quick-reference.html > > I'm supposed to give finished copies to the Webmaster on Sunday, so > hopefully someone can fix QRG (either by editing it, or by editing > Primer and NFR to add the right destinations). > > -- Sandro > > -- Jie Bao http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie Facebook,Twitter,Skype,Msn,LinkedIn - check url above
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 18:14:49 UTC