- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:19:46 +0200
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi, I'm currently in the process of reviewing the XML Serialization, but it seems there's still some 'unfinished business'. Please advise on how to proceed: should I wait a bit until the prefix abbreviation mechanism is finalised? Best, Rinke On 31 mrt 2009, at 12:28, Bijan Parsia wrote: > I've updated the schema to handle prefix declarations: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=OWL_XML_Schema&diff=21025&oldid=20011 > > The only issue remaining (before I update the spec text and declare > victory) is how to distinguish IRIs from AbbreviatedIRIs. I've > suggested a separate attribute and a leading token. Basically: > > <Class abbrevIRI="bjp:Person/> > <Class aIRI="bjp:Person"/> > > vs. > > <Class IRI=">bjp:Person"/> > > The problem, of course, is that >bjp:Person is not a valid anyURI. > > vs. > Depends on whether there's a declaration (the Sandro Solution) > > I'm also inclined to forbid relative URIs. They are a pain to cope > with and to explain. I think having one univocal way to abbreviate > URIs is overall much more beneficial than to have 2 mechanisms where > one is optimized for a sorta strange case. A case I use a lot, but a > bit of an outlier none-the-less. > > Thoughts welcome. Otherwise, I'll mope a bit and pick a solution. > > Cheers, > Bijan. --- Drs Rinke Hoekstra Leibniz Center for Law | AI Department Faculty of Law | Faculty of Sciences Universiteit van Amsterdam | Vrije Universiteit Kloveniersburgwal 48 | De Boelelaan 1081a 1012 CX Amsterdam | 1081 HV Amsterdam +31-(0)20-5253499 | +31-(0)20-5987752 hoekstra@uva.nl | hoekstra@few.vu.nl Homepage: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 13:20:26 UTC