- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:09:54 +0200
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0011DA53B@judith.fzi.de>
>-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Bijan Parsia >Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:56 PM >To: W3C OWL Working Group >Subject: Re: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges > >On 1 Apr 2009, at 20:44, Michael Schneider wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- >>> request@w3.org] >>> On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:47 PM >>> To: W3C OWL Working Group >>> Subject: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges >>> >>> We didn't manage to conclude this discussion. >>> >>> Summary of (my understanding of) the discussion so far: >>> >>> * we all believe that OWL 2 *should* only support unary datatypes/ >>> ranges, and that ontology documents including n-ary *should* be non- >>> conformant >> >> Hm, I thought that if C&P extends Pellet by support for certain n-ary >> datatypes, then C&P should still be allowed to call Pellet a >> conformant OWL >> 2 DL reasoner? > >[snip] > >Isn't this always the problem with extensions? > >But here it's about documents. An OWL Document with n-ary predicates >in it is not a conforming OWL Document (it is an extended owl >document). Thus, a conforming OWL reasoner may reject it. > >An OWL reasoner which, in some mode, accepts such documents is no >more non-conforming than if it accepts XML Schema documents and >checks them for satisfiability or if it accepts HTML and renders it. Yes, I think you are right! In general, a conformant OWL 2 XX entailment checker is only forced to produce the correct set of entailments for a conformant OWL 2 XX document. For non-conformant documents, I think the situation is that it may well decide to accept them, either, and produce whatever result it likes. >Cheers, >Bijan. Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus =======================================================================
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 20:10:35 UTC