public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2009 by date

Thursday, 30 April 2009

• A proposal for clarifying the definitions of datatype maps Boris Motik
• Re: Rationales for OWL 2 new features Christine Golbreich

Wednesday, 29 April 2009

• Re: Rationales for OWL 2 new features Uli Sattler
• Re: examples in NF&R Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Rationales for OWL 2 new features Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• examples in NF&R Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• typographical issues in NF&R Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: examples in NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: Quick Review of New Features and Rationale Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Can we have linked icon on the wiki? Jie Bao
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Jie Bao
• Re: Quick Review of New Features and Rationale Christine Golbreich
• Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

• Agenda TC 29/04/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: Report on current test case coverage Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Report on current test case coverage Michael Schneider
• Report on current test case coverage Markus Krötzsch

Monday, 27 April 2009

• RE: [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Michael Schneider
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Ivan Herman
• Re: LC reply Bijan Parsia
• RE: [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Michael Schneider
• LC reply Bijan Parsia
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Ivan Herman
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [Fwd: Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call)] Ivan Herman
• Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call) Stasinos Konstantopoulos

Sunday, 26 April 2009

• Entailment as Syntax Test Case Category Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of the n-ary extension Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 23 April 2009

• Re: [OWL2-Profiles] error in grammar production Ian Horrocks
• Re: [OWL2-Profiles] error in grammar production Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Quick Review of New Features and Rationale Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Fwd: [OWL2-Profiles] error in grammar production Ian Horrocks
• a quick comment on NF&R Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Sandro Hawke
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Deborah L McGuinness
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Christine Golbreich

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

• ACTION-333 Quick Review of Quick Reference Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Jie Bao
• Re: Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Jie Bao
• Re: Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-rdf-text-20090421 Boris Motik
• RE: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-rdf-text-20090421 Achille Fokoue
• Re: Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Christine Golbreich
• Re: Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Jie Bao
• Quick Reference Guide in 2 pages (even less) Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: A note on "non" and "non-" Boris Motik
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Thomas Schneider
• Re: Proposed CLOSE ISSUE 56 with no action ( was Re: Agenda TC 22/04/2009) Christine Golbreich
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Sandro Hawke
• RE: Minor comments on rdf:text Michael Schneider
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Bijan Parsia
• RE: A note on "non" and "non-" Michael Schneider
• Test case process and status (2009-04-15 telecon followup) Mike Smith
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Sandro Hawke
• RE: A note on "non" and "non-" Boris Motik
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: A note on "non" and "non-" Boris Motik
• Re: A note on "non" and "non-" Bijan Parsia
• A note on "non" and "non-" Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: Minor comments on rdf:text Boris Motik
• Re: Minor comments on rdf:text Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

• Proposed CLOSE ISSUE 56 with no action ( was Re: Agenda TC 22/04/2009) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda TC 22/04/2009 Evan Wallace
• Re: Minor comments on rdf:text Sandro Hawke
• Re: Minor comments on rdf:text Jie Bao
• Minor comments on rdf:text Antoine Zimmermann
• LC Comments from WG members Ian Horrocks
• Agenda TC 22/04/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• round 6 Sandro Hawke
• Minutes of 2009-04-15 telecon ready for review Mike Smith
• Re: please look over drafts one more time... Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: please look over drafts one more time... Bijan Parsia
• Re: please look over drafts one more time... Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 20 April 2009

• Re: please look over drafts one more time... Sandro Hawke
• please look over drafts one more time... Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 18 April 2009

• Re: private review of Profiles, Section 4.3 (OWL 2 RL/RDF rules) Ivan Herman

Friday, 17 April 2009

• Re: Freezing documents for publication Jie Bao
• Re: Freezing documents for publication Christine Golbreich
• Re: Freezing documents for publication Sandro Hawke
• RE: Freezing documents for publication Michael Schneider
• Re: Freezing documents for publication Jie Bao
• RE: private review of Profiles, Section 4.3 (OWL 2 RL/RDF rules) Michael Schneider
• Re: Freezing documents for publication Sandro Hawke
• Freezing documents for publication Ian Horrocks
• RE: private review of Profiles, Section 4.3 (OWL 2 RL/RDF rules) Boris Motik
• Re: "at risk" Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 16 April 2009

• Re: "at risk" Sandro Hawke
• Re: "at risk" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• "at risk" Sandro Hawke
• private review of Profiles, Section 4.3 (OWL 2 RL/RDF rules) Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-320 Review profiles Jie Bao
• Re: Questions about annotation property in OWL 2 Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Negative Property Assertions (NPAs) in RL Michael Schneider
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG Bijan Parsia
• Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call) Phil Archer
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: several broken rules in RL? Ivan Herman
• Re: Invitation for review of POWDER documents (Last Call) Ivan Herman
• RE: several broken rules in RL? Boris Motik

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

• Fwd: OWL Quick Reference Jie Bao
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG Jie Bao
• Negative Property Assertions (NPAs) in RL Bijan Parsia
• RE: several broken rules in RL? Michael Schneider
• RE: several broken rules in RL? Michael Schneider
• RE: several broken rules in RL? Boris Motik
• several broken rules in RL? Michael Schneider
• typing triples in RL rules for negative property assertions Michael Schneider
• Questions about annotation property in OWL 2 Tao, Cui, Ph.D.
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Jie Bao
• Re: QRG in pdf Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: QRG in pdf Sandro Hawke
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Christine Golbreich
• Re: QRG in pdf Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: QRG in pdf Jie Bao
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Uli Sattler
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Christine Golbreich
• Re: QRG in pdf Bijan Parsia
• Re: QRG in pdf Christine Golbreich
• Re: QRG and NF&R Jie Bao
• Re: QRG in pdf Bijan Parsia
• [admin] Today's scribe won't attend OWL teleconference Evan Wallace
• Re: QRG and NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: QRG in pdf Christine Golbreich
• Re: document validation, links Markus Krötzsch
• Re: QRG in pdf Bijan Parsia
• QRG in pdf Jie Bao
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Bijan Parsia
• Re: QRG and NF&R Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: publication status, issues, preview drafts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: publication status, issues, preview drafts Sandro Hawke
• Re: QRG and NF&R Jie Bao
• Re: QRG and NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: QRG and NF&R Ian Horrocks
• RE: Private review of the Document Overview Michael Schneider
• Re: Primer: Summary of updates Sebastian Rudolph
• Re: QRG and NF&R Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: publication status, issues, preview drafts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: reply to a POWDER Group request Michael Schneider
• RE: Table style Michael Schneider
• Re: document validation, links Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: publication status, issues, preview drafts Michael Schneider
• Re: QRG and NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Citing a web page Bijan Parsia
• Re: QRG and NF&R Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Private review of the Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Primer: Summary of updates Markus Krötzsch
• Re: QRG and NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: document validation, links Markus Krötzsch
• QRG and NF&R Rinke Hoekstra
• Table style Rinke Hoekstra
• Primer: Example syntax improved Markus Krötzsch
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Ivan Herman
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Ivan Herman
• Re: elisa's action-321 Elisa Kendall

Tuesday, 14 April 2009

• Re: elisa's action-321 Ian Horrocks
• publication status, issues, preview drafts Sandro Hawke
• Re: elisa's action-321 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda TC 15/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• Re: elisa's action-321 Ian Horrocks
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Ian Horrocks
• Re: Links to the wiki Sandro Hawke
• RE: Agenda TC 15/04/2009 Michael Schneider
• RE: Links to the wiki Michael Schneider
• Re: document validation, links Markus Krötzsch
• Links to the wiki Sandro Hawke
• Re: general review of NF&R Christine Golbreich
• . Bijan Parsia
• Minutes ready for review Pan, Dr Jeff Z.
• Re: document validation, links Sandro Hawke
• elisa's action-321 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Agenda TC 15/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Agenda TC 15/04/2009 Christine Golbreich
• Agenda TC 15/04/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: Action-317 Review of Conformance and Test Cases Mike Smith
• Re: document validation, links Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• more Wiki madness - Re: document validation, links Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: document validation, links Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: document validation, links Bijan Parsia
• Re: document validation, links Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: document validation, links Michael Schneider
• RE: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Michael Schneider
• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Ian Horrocks
• document validation, links Sandro Hawke
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Ivan Herman
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Sandro Hawke

Monday, 13 April 2009

• RE: reply to a POWDER Group request Michael Schneider
• RE: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Michael Schneider
• Re: reply to a POWDER Group request Bijan Parsia
• RE: reply to a POWDER Group request Michael Schneider
• Minor editorial comment on RDF mapping Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Action-317 Review of Conformance and Test Cases Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: [LC response] To Zhe Wu Re: OWL 2 LC Comments Zhe Wu
• Re: Review "Changes Since December" document Ian Horrocks
• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Ian Horrocks

Sunday, 12 April 2009

• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review "Changes Since December" document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Sandro Hawke
• [Fwd: RE: Review "Changes Since December" document] Ivan Herman
• RE: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Michael Schneider
• Re: Review "Changes Since December" document Ivan Herman

Saturday, 11 April 2009

• Re: Review "Changes Since December" document Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 10 April 2009

• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Bijan Parsia
• Re: Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Ian Horrocks
• Review "Changes Since December" document [RE: Where do we put the changelogs? ] Michael Schneider
• RE: Where do we put the changelogs? Michael Schneider
• RE: "OWL 2 IRI vocabulary" considered harmful Michael Schneider
• Re: "OWL 2 IRI vocabulary" considered harmful Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: "OWL 2 IRI vocabulary" considered harmful (was Re: Occurrences of "OWL 2 Full" in our documents) Michael Schneider
• Re: Where do we put the changelogs? Sandro Hawke
• Datatype (Map) Conformance Strangeness Michael Schneider
• "OWL 2 IRI vocabulary" considered harmful (was Re: Occurrences of "OWL 2 Full" in our documents) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Private review of the Document Overview Michael Schneider
• Where do we put the changelogs? Michael Schneider
• RE: I am happy with all the responses. Re: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Michael Schneider
• RE: Occurrences of "OWL 2 Full" in our documents Michael Schneider

Thursday, 9 April 2009

• Re: owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI implemented (in Syntax and Mapping) - still need QRG and RDF-Based Semantics Jie Bao
• Re: Occurrences of "OWL 2 Full" in our documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• I am happy with all the responses. Re: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Zhe Wu
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION-329 owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI Jie Bao
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Mike Smith
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Bijan Parsia
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Document name "Conformance" Ian Horrocks
• Re: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Zhe Wu
• ACTION-326, ACTION-328: DONE (owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ACTION-329 owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI Ian Horrocks
• Congratulations and thanks Ian Horrocks
• Occurrences of "OWL 2 Full" in our documents Michael Schneider
• Primer changes Sebastian Rudolph
• Document accessibility Bijan Parsia
• Document name "Conformance" Michael Schneider
• xsd:dateTime example Boris Motik

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

• RE: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Michael Schneider
• RE: owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI implemented (in Syntax and Mapping) - still need QRG and RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: Negative property assertions and complementOf in Profiles implemented Bijan Parsia
• Negative property assertions and complementOf in Profiles implemented Boris Motik
• Re: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Zhe Wu
• Re: owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI implemented (in Syntax and Mapping) - still need QRG and RDF-Based Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Updated diff to the owl:versionInfo stuff Boris Motik
• owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI imlpemented Boris Motik
• Fwd: OWL XML Serialization Review Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Primer ready for internal review Ivan Herman
• Regretts for today's telco Michael Schneider
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Action 309: Review of QR document Jie Bao
• Re: Review of QRG (Action 307) Jie Bao
• Re: Primer ready for internal review Sandro Hawke
• Re: Primer ready for internal review Sebastian Rudolph
• changed old "OWL" to "OWL 1" in RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• RE: Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Michael Schneider
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Bijan Parsia
• XML Schema tweaks Bijan Parsia
• RE: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Michel_Dumontier
• RE: Review of RDF Mapping Michael Schneider
• Re: Review of RDF Mapping Evren Sirin
• RE: Review of RDF Mapping Boris Motik
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• RE: Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Michael Schneider
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of RDF Mapping Evren Sirin
• Re: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Ivan Herman
• RE: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Michael Schneider
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Michael Schneider
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Ivan Herman
• RE: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Michael Schneider
• RE: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Michael Schneider
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Ian Horrocks
• RE: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Boris Motik
• Re: XML best practices Bijan Parsia
• XML best practices Bijan Parsia
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Review Mapping to RDF Graphs Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Ivan Herman
• Review of NF&R (Action 321) Elisa Kendall
• Re: N-ary document Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review Mapping to RDF Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 7 April 2009

• Request for Implementation Input: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Antoine Isaac
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Bijan Parsia
• RE: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Michael Schneider
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Sandro Hawke
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Bijan Parsia
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Markus Krötzsch
• RE: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Michael Schneider
• Review Mapping to RDF Graphs Markus Krötzsch
• Re: review of n-ary extension Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• review of n-ary extension Michel_Dumontier
• RE: Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Michael Schneider
• Review of RDF Based semantics [2nd] Zhe Wu
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Datatype map conformance designation needed Ian Horrocks
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of the n-ary extension Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• Last call before 2nd Last Call Ian Horrocks
• RE: Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Michael Schneider
• RE: Issue with RDF encoding of inverse property axioms/expressions Michael Schneider
• Agenda TC 08/04/2009 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: Review of the n-ary extension Bijan Parsia
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Re: Issue with RDF encoding of inverse property axioms/expressions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-317 Review of Conformance and Test Cases Mike Smith
• Issue with RDF encoding of inverse property axioms/expressions Michael Schneider
• RE: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Boris Motik
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Ian Horrocks
• Re: Primer ready for internal review Ivan Herman
• Re: Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Sandro Hawke
• Wiki seems to be near to collapse! Ian Horrocks
• Review of the n-ary extension Boris Motik
• RE: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-320 Review profiles Ian Horrocks
• Re: N-ary document Bijan Parsia
• RE: Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Boris Motik
• Re: Review of RDF Mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• reply to a POWDER Group request Ivan Herman
• Re: Overview: to keep Fig 2 or not to keep Fig 2? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Confusion about the Working Group Ian Horrocks
• Overview: to keep Fig 2 or not to keep Fig 2? Ian Horrocks
• Re: Action-322 Review of New features and rationale. Christine Golbreich
• Re: Confusion about the Working Group Ivan Herman

Monday, 6 April 2009

• N-ary document Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Schema Fixed Bijan Parsia
• Review of the RDF Mapping (Action 315) Michael Schneider
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: OWL XML Serialization Review Bijan Parsia
• Re: Review of XML Serialization (first part) Bijan Parsia
• Fwd: OWL XML Serialization Review Ian Horrocks
• Confusion about the Working Group Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-319 Review profiles Ian Horrocks
• Review of RDF Mapping Evren Sirin
• Re: review of Document Overview Christine Golbreich
• Re: XML Syntax updated Bijan Parsia
• Review of XML Serialization (first part) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Part II: Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: XML Syntax updated Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Boris Motik
• Part II: Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider [RE: review of RDF-Based Semantics] Michael Schneider
• Re: Action 311-- Review of SS&FS document Bijan Parsia
• Re: Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action 311-- Review of SS&FS document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Michael Schneider
• Re: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Review Direct Semantics Thomas Schneider
• Re: Preliminary Review of "Conformance and Test Cases" (as of 20 March 2009) Ian Horrocks
• RE: Review Direct Semantics Boris Motik
• Re: Review Direct Semantics Thomas Schneider
• RE: Action 311-- Review of SS&FS document Boris Motik
• RE: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Michael Schneider
• RE: Review Direct Semantics Boris Motik
• Re: review of Document Overview Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Ian Horrocks
• Re: Primer ready for internal review Ian Horrocks
• Re: review of Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Re: Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Thomas Schneider

Sunday, 5 April 2009

• Review of Direct Semantics (ACTION 314) Michael Schneider
• Re: Publication of User Facing Documents Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Review Direct Semantics Thomas Schneider
• RE: Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Michael Schneider

Saturday, 4 April 2009

• Primer ready for internal review Markus Krötzsch
• Re: review of Document Overview Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes TC 01/04/2009 Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Proposed comment about CURIEs Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposed comment about CURIEs Ivan Herman
• Re: review of Document Overview Ivan Herman
• Re: Publication of User Facing Documents Christine Golbreich
• Re: Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316) Ivan Herman

Friday, 3 April 2009

• RE: Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316) Michael Schneider
• Re: review of Document Overview Sandro Hawke
• Re: review of Document Overview Sandro Hawke
• Re: review of Document Overview Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposed comment about CURIEs Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposed comment about CURIEs Bijan Parsia
• CURIE permits restrictions Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Bijan Parsia
• Proposed comment about CURIEs Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Re: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Michael Schneider
• Action 311-- Review of SS&FS document Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Publication of User Facing Documents Ian Horrocks
• Re: review of Document Overview Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316) Ivan Herman
• Re: review of Document Overview Christine Golbreich

Thursday, 2 April 2009

• Re: Action-317 Review of Conformance and Test Cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Review of the RDF based semantics document (CLOSE ACTION-316) Michael Schneider
• Part I of Response to Peter F. Patel-Schneider [RE: review of RDF-Based Semantics] Michael Schneider
• postponing work on references Sandro Hawke
• multi-syntax support (Primer, Syntax, NF&R, ...) Sandro Hawke
• Re: review of Document Overview Bijan Parsia
• Re: review of Document Overview Jim Hendler
• Review/revision of Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Re: review of Document Overview Sandro Hawke
• Re: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Michael Schneider
• Re: review of Document Overview Ian Horrocks
• Fwd: Use of owl:versionInfo to record ontology version IRI in RDF Uli Sattler
• RE: Added owl:dateTime to RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: Added owl:dateTime to RDF-Based Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Manchester Syntax and labels Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 1 April 2009

• Re: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Michael Schneider
• ACTION-319 Review profiles Achille Fokoue
• Added owl:dateTime to RDF-Based Semantics Michael Schneider
• RE: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Michael Schneider
• Re: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Bijan Parsia
• RE: RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Michael Schneider
• Re: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Christine Golbreich
• Differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 -- where should they be documented? Ian Horrocks
• RDF-Based Semantics and n-ary dataranges Ian Horrocks
• differences between OWL 1 and OWL 2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Datatype map conformance designation needed Jonathan Rees
• Manchester Syntax and labels Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Quick comments on the QRG Jie Bao
• Re: ACTION-320 Review profiles Jie Bao
• Action-322 Review of New features and rationale. Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Acknowlegment glitch Ian Horrocks
• ACTION-320 Review profiles Jie Bao
• Re: I've implemented the changes to xsd:dateTimeStamp Evan Wallace
• Re: Agenda TC 01/04/2009 Ian Horrocks
• Addendum to my review of the RDF Based semantics (ACTION-316) Ivan Herman
• Re: general review of NF&R Christine Golbreich
• Re: Agenda TC 01/04/2009 Ivan Herman
• Action-317 Review of Conformance and Test Cases Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Review of Manchester Syntax Document Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2009 16:25:16 UTC