relative uri references

• From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:04:47 -0500
• To: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <29af5e2d0811232204j37a6472frb9f47f4098e620f7@mail.gmail.com>

Do we not  have to say how these are resolved in the functional and
manchester syntax, and might it not be best to explicitly say so for all
syntaxes?
-Alan

Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 06:05:22 UTC