- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:10:57 -0000
- To: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'W3C OWL Working Group'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hello, I've changed it like this: All other URIs from the reserved vocabulary constitute the ''disallowed vocabulary'' of OWL 2 and <em title="MUST in RFC 2119 context" class="RFC2119">MUST NOT</em> be used in OWL 2 to name entities, ontologies, and ontology versions. Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg > Sent: 12 November 2008 04:51 > To: Boris Motik > Cc: W3C OWL Working Group > Subject: Re: Syntax: Table 3 > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Boris Motik > <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It is true that these resources are allowed in OWL ontologies; however, they do not belong to Table > 3 of Syntax. This table simply > > lists the vocabulary elements from the rdf, rdfs, owl, and xsd namespaces that have special meaning > in OWL 2. That is, vocabulary > > elements from Table 3 can be used in the ontologies in functional-style syntax even though they are > in one of the built-in > > namespaces. > > > > In contrast, owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DepretatedProperty cannot be used in ontologies in > functional-style syntax. They are part > > of the reserved vocabulary, just like, say, owl:someValuesFrom. > > OK, then I think it might be good to clarify the text, which currently > says: "All other URIs from the reserved vocabulary constitute the > disallowed vocabulary of OWL 2 and must not be used in OWL 2 > ontologies" > > Perhaps add "as expressed in the functional syntax" ? > > -Alan > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Boris > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan > Ruttenberg > >> Sent: 11 November 2008 07:54 > >> To: W3C OWL Working Group > >> Subject: Syntax: Table 3 > >> > >> > >> is missing owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty which are > >> allowed in OWL ontologies according to table 16 of the RDF mapping. > >> > >> -Alan > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 09:11:39 UTC