Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type

From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:27:28 -0500

> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is my initial draft of an appendix to Syntax that has the stuff
> > needed for the MIME type.  I think that the equivalent for the
> > Manchester Syntax would be very similar.
> >
> > peter
> 
> snip
> 
> > Applications which use this media type:
> >    No widely deployed applications are known to use this media type. It
> >    may be used by some web services and clients consuming their data.
> 
> Current doc says Protege 4 and Topbraid. I was surprised about
> Topbraid. Is this verified? I sent a note to Jeremy Carroll to
> confirm.

> > Author/Change controller:
> >    The OWL Functional Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
> >    Group; W3C reserves change control over this specification.
> 
> Current document says:
> 
> "Author/Change controller
> The OWL functional-style Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
> Group in cooperation with OWL ontology tool builders; the
> specification may be extended by groups of OWL tool builders; W3C
> reserves change control over this specification.
> "
> 
> I'm not sure what it means that the specification can be extended by
> someone but that change control is in the hands of the W3C.

> -Alan

Both of these are cut-and-paste errors caused by copying from the
section for the Manchester syntax.  I've reverted them (with minor
changes).

Thanks for catching this problem.

peter

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 22:51:08 UTC