- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:02:30 -0500
- To: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Following the discussion of rational numbers I haven't found any reason to support lexical rationals versus a datatype. However I have some questions about conformance and implementation burden. 1) What is the proposed minimal conformance, i.e. what rational literals are core literals? 2) What are the implementation requirements for core rational literals? One needs to be able to both compare rationals to other numeric datatypes as well as compare them to each other. Analogous to the issues we discussed with implementation of rational numbers, how does one implement a satisfiability test for r1 < f < r2 where r1 and r2 are rationals and f is a floating point number? Note: Implementations of rational numbers I'm aware of use arbitrary precision arithmetic. As I recall, the reason we did not require arbitrary precision integer arithmetic for minimal conformance so as to avoid the necessity of all implementation using such. Thanks, Alan
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 21:11:07 UTC