- From: Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:02:37 +0100
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200811041902.48431.mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Below is my review for http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Data_Range_Extension:_Linear_Equations This addresses Action 237. Markus In addition to what Boris and Bernardo already said, I have the following comments: * "one might be wish" -> "one might wish" * "can be used to defined classes" -> "can be used to define classes" * Section 2? * Sec 3.1, first set of production rules: ** Non-terminal "rational" should be capitalised. ** I don't get the purpose of 'times' '(' [ rational ] Variable | Variable ')' Why not just say: 'times' '(' [ Rational ] Variable ')' ** Similarly with the following: 'plus' '(' Term { Term } | Term ')' which could be 'plus' '(' Term { Term } ')' * I don't understand what Sec. 3.3 tries to convey. Maybe make an editors note "under construction"? * What happened to the various types of comparisons in Sec 3.4? * I agree with Boris regarding the issues with the semantics definition for variable comparisons. A unified treatment of the various comparisons would probably fix this en route. Overall, the document would benefit from more verbose explanations to better explain the purposes and intuitions of the technical definitions. -- Markus Krötzsch Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe phone +49 (0)721 608 7362 fax +49 (0)721 608 5998 mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de www http://korrekt.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 18:03:29 UTC