public-owl-wg@w3.org from March 2008 by date

Monday, 31 March 2008

Re: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [Reminder] UFDTF TC @ Mon Mar 31 10am - 11am () Deborah L. McGuinness
Turtle version of the primer's ontology (was Re: Some comments on the Primer document) Ivan Herman
comment on primer: RDF/XML encoding of property lists.... Ivan Herman
Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer Ivan Herman
RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider

Saturday, 29 March 2008

Friday, 28 March 2008

Re: some syntax errors in the RDF/XML example Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: some syntax errors in the RDF/XML example Ivan Herman
Re: some syntax errors in the RDF/XML example Peter F. Patel-Schneider
some syntax errors in the RDF/XML example Ivan Herman
Re: abstracts Ian Horrocks
Thanks to primer reviewers Bijan Parsia
Re: Some comments on the Primer document Bijan Parsia
Re: Some comments on the Primer document Ivan Herman
Re: Some comments on the Primer document Bijan Parsia
fragments comments Jeremy Carroll
I have just implemented the resolution of ISSUE-12 Boris Motik
Some comments on the Primer document Ivan Herman
ISSUE-107 (deprecate Lite): RAISED: Deprecate OWL Lite OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-106 (namespace): RAISED: reuse OWL 1.0 namespace? owl11 poor prefix choice OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
I've just added a note for DL-lite, as requested by my ACTION-116 Boris Motik
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Jeremy Carroll
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Michael Schneider
comment on fragments Jeremy Carroll
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Nonstructural restrictions Rinke Hoekstra
Re: Nonstructural restrictions Uli Sattler
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Jeremy Carroll
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Michael Schneider
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Fwd: Nonstructural restrictions Carsten Lutz
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Jeremy Carroll
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Michael Schneider
RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Michael Schneider
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Michael Schneider
Re: Nonstructural restrictions Rinke Hoekstra

Thursday, 27 March 2008

Re: Nonstructural restrictions Uli Sattler
Fwd: Nonstructural restrictions Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Data property axioms in EL++ [ was Re: Review of Fragments Doc for ACTION-110 ] Carsten Lutz
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Boris Motik

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

Re: Negative object/data property assertions in EL++ Achille Fokoue
Re: Negative object/data property assertions in EL++ Achille Fokoue
Re: Negative object/data property assertions in EL++ Carsten Lutz
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Michael Smith
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Michael Smith
Draft minutes from today's OWL WG teleconference Markus Krötzsch
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Boris Motik
Negative object/data property assertions in EL++ Evren Sirin
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Bijan Parsia
abstracts Sandro Hawke
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Alan Ruttenberg
Fwd: Interruption to W3C Teleconference System Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Michael Smith
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Michael Smith
Fwd: Interruption to W3C Teleconference System Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Michael Schneider
RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider
Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Agenda for Teleconf 26th March 2008 Ian Horrocks
ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics Michael Schneider

Monday, 24 March 2008

Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
xml namespace and schema-location for OWL 1.1 XML Syntax Sandro Hawke
in-line review comments Sandro Hawke
Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Michael Schneider
Re: Monday imports TF meeting cancelled Achille Fokoue
Re: Monday imports TF meeting cancelled Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Michael Schneider
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-67 Michael Schneider
Re: Monday imports TF meeting cancelled Alan Ruttenberg
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-67 Alan Ruttenberg
Review of Primer Doc Deborah L. McGuinness

Sunday, 23 March 2008

Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Agenda for Washington F2F Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Monday imports TF meeting cancelled Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-105 (meta/data): Meta Issue to track other issues related to datatypes OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Alan Ruttenberg
RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Boris Motik
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-81 Alan Ruttenberg
Changes to annotation properties (addressing ACTION-113) Boris Motik
Monday imports TF meeting cancelled Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 22 March 2008

Agenda for Washington F2F Ian Horrocks

Friday, 21 March 2008

ISSUE-104 (disallowed vocabulary): OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed vocabulary OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
naming OWL-R :-) Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 20 March 2008

still no information on F2F attendance for Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: responses to reviews for XML syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: XML Serialization (xml comment, schema) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: XML Serialization (xml comment, schema) Sandro Hawke
Re: XML Serialization Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: XML Serialization Alan Ruttenberg
Re: XML Serialization Alan Ruttenberg
Action 100 update (OWL R in N3) Jim Hendler
Re: XML Serialization Peter F. Patel-Schneider
XML Serialization Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

Re: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Michael Schneider
responses to reviews for XML syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
OWL WG - minutes from today's teleconference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
OWL Primer review Jie Bao
ACTION-102: The situation of deprecation in OWL-1.0-DL and OWL-1.0-Full Michael Schneider
Proposal to close ISSUE-12 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

F2F2 registration Peter F. Patel-Schneider
F2F2 status Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ACTION-106: Detailed review of the Fragments Proposal and XML serialization documents Achille Fokoue
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday March 19, 2008 Ian Horrocks
musings on document reviews Sandro Hawke
Review of XML Doc for ACTION-107 (was Oops and review comments) Ian Horrocks
RE: fragments question re DL-Lite Boris Motik
fragments question re DL-Lite Jim Hendler

Monday, 17 March 2008

Review of Fragments Doc for ACTION-110 Michael Smith
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Alan Wu
Proposal to close ISSUE-78: OWL-Lite as EL++ Alan Ruttenberg
Raw minutes from UFDTF meeting 208-03-17 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Ian Horrocks
Re: status of ISSUE-79 ? Carsten Lutz
Action 106: Detailed review of the Fragments Proposal Achille Fokoue
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Alan Ruttenberg
ISSUE-103 (metamapping): Meta Issue to track other issues related to mapping OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 16 March 2008

status of ISSUE-79 ? Alan Ruttenberg
Proposal to close ISSUE-75: OWL-Lite as EL++ Alan Ruttenberg
Proposal to close Issue-75 Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 15 March 2008

Re: unionOf vs. disjointUnionOf in the RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-15: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI Peter F. Patel-Schneider
unionOf vs. disjointUnionOf in the RDF mapping Michael Schneider
User Facing Document Task Force Meeting Monday March 17, 2008 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
Re: OWL Primer Alan Ruttenberg
NOT!! Imports Task Force Meeting Monday March 17, 2008 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
Imports Task Force Meeting Monday March 17, 2008 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 14 March 2008

Minutes of this week meeting Achille Fokoue
Oops and review comments Bijan Parsia
RDF-to-Functional mapping: What happens if an RDF graph contains un-mappable portions? Michael Schneider
Re: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string Bijan Parsia
RE: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string Michael Schneider
Re: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string Bijan Parsia
RE: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string Michael Schneider

Thursday, 13 March 2008

RE: A proposal for the fragments document Michael Schneider
RE: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Michael Schneider
RE: Question about annotation of and to axioms Boris Motik
Question about annotation of and to axioms Alan Ruttenberg
F2F Agenda Alan Ruttenberg
RE: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Boris Motik
RE: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Michael Schneider
Re: proposal to close ...-102 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Bijan Parsia
Re: proposal to close ...-102 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Boris Motik
Re: proposal to close ISSUE-102 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Alan Ruttenberg
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Jim Hendler
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

Re: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF (ISSUE-100) Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Action-97 Proposal for User-facing documentation: OWL Cookbook Vojtech Svatek
RE: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Michael Schneider
Re: ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ACTION-93 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Alan Ruttenberg
proposal to close ISSUE-102 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ACTION-103 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
closing EDITORIAL ISSUE-101 plain literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: OWL Primer Deborah L. McGuinness
ACTION-93 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: OWL Primer Alan Ruttenberg
Re: OWL Primer Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: ISSUE-102 (AnnotationProperty): RAISED - No Discussion Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Deborah L. McGuinness
OWL WG F2F sign-up Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Michael Schneider
Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Elisa F. Kendall
RE: ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state Michael Schneider
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Boris Motik
Re: ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state Ivan Herman
Agenda Héctor Pérez-Urbina
Re: Agenda for TC Wed 2008-03-12 Rinke Hoekstra
Action-97 Proposal for User-facing documentation: OWL Cookbook Alan Ruttenberg
Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-102 (AnnotationProperty): RAISED - No Discussion Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): RAISED - No Discussion Alan Ruttenberg
Agenda for TC Wed 2008-03-12 Alan Ruttenberg
ISSUE-102 (AnnotationProperty): URI cannot be declared to be an annotation property, which in turn means that annotation URIs can't have annotations on them OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-101 (plainliterals): equating plain literals with no language tag to xsd:string OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

ACTION-93 (Full semantics): Short report about current state Michael Schneider
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Michael Schneider
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Boris Motik
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Bijan Parsia
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Ivan Herman
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Ivan Herman
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Michael Schneider
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Alan Ruttenberg
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday Jim Hendler
General discussion for TC Wednesday Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 10 March 2008

raw minutes of imports tf meeting Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Distinguishing fragments Alan Wu
Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Distinguishing fragments Jeremy Carroll
Re: Distinguishing fragments Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 8 March 2008

RE: Equating subproperties to restricted properties Conrad Bock
Regrets for March 12 & 19 Telecons Elisa F. Kendall
Re: Equating subproperties to restricted properties Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 7 March 2008

Re: Distinguishing fragments Ian Horrocks
Re: Distinguishing fragments Jim Hendler
Re: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Alan Ruttenberg
Distinguishing fragments Ian Horrocks
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Bijan Parsia
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Achille Fokoue
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Jim Hendler
Re: ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF Jeremy Carroll
Re: ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF Bijan Parsia
Re: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-100 (rdfall): NO DISCUSSION YET Alan Ruttenberg
RE: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Michael Schneider
Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday 10AM EST Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-100 (rdfall): Should there be valid OWL ontologies that can not be expressed in RDF OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Jeremy Carroll
Equating subproperties to restricted properties Conrad Bock
a comment on the fragment document Jeremy Carroll
RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Michael Smith
Re: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Ian Horrocks
RE: ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] Boris Motik
ISSUE-99 (Test): Testing tracker OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: nonmon mapping and punning Michael Schneider
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Carsten Lutz
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ivan Herman
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
Re: [META] Raising a new issue as "raised" or "open"? Ian Horrocks
ISSUE-98 (spelling): symetric => symmetric [editorial] OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Sandro Hawke
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Sandro Hawke
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Bijan Parsia
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Jim Hendler

Thursday, 6 March 2008

Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ian Horrocks
Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Restructuring StrucSpec and Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Jim Hendler
RE: [META] Raising a new issue as "raised" or "open"? Michael Schneider
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ivan Herman
Re: [META] Raising a new issue as "raised" or "open"? Alan Ruttenberg
adding rule names. Re: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments Alan Wu
RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Boris Motik
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Bijan Parsia
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ivan Herman
RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Boris Motik
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Bijan Parsia
RE: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Boris Motik
[META] Raising a new issue as "raised" or "open"? Michael Schneider
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ivan Herman
Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Bijan Parsia
comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite Ivan Herman
RE: Restructuring StrucSpec and Semantics Boris Motik
RE: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments Boris Motik
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Alan Ruttenberg
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Bijan Parsia
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Alan Ruttenberg
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Bijan Parsia
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Alan Ruttenberg
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

Restructuring StrucSpec and Semantics Bijan Parsia
Re: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments Alan Wu
Re: OWL XML serialization Rinke Hoekstra
Re: OWL XML serialization Bijan Parsia
Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Alan Ruttenberg
[Fwd: Re: A proposal for a way forward regarding fragments] Alan Wu
RE: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Michael Schneider
OWL XML serialization Rinke Hoekstra
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Rinke Hoekstra
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Ivan Herman
RE: A proposal for the fragments document Boris Motik
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Ivan Herman
Relational database vs. RDF Incubator group launched Ivan Herman
Re: A proposal for the fragments document Jim Hendler
Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Elisa F. Kendall
Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Elisa F. Kendall

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

Agenda for TC 2008-03-05 Alan Ruttenberg
A proposal for the fragments document Boris Motik
RE: nonmon mapping and punning Michael Schneider
RE: A summary of the proposed resolution of ISSUE-95 Michael Schneider
A summary of the proposed resolution of ISSUE-95 Boris Motik
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Bijan Parsia
ISSUE-97 (GRDDL): Add GRDDL to OWL/XML Syntax OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Michael Smith
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Rinke Hoekstra
Issue-3 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: [OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Ivan Herman
RE: nonmon mapping and punning Michael Schneider
ISSUE-93: A sub-Wiki for OWL-Full development Michael Schneider
"feature at a time" semantics (ACTION-79) Alan Ruttenberg
"feature at a time" semantics (ACTION-86) Alan Ruttenberg
General discussion for Wednesday's teleconference Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 3 March 2008

Re: OWL Primer now OK on Wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
[OWL WG] Draft minutes from Wednesday, February 27th Elisa F. Kendall
Re: OWL Primer Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: nonmon mapping and punning Bijan Parsia
[UFDTF] Follow-up on utility of the Semantic Web Reference Card Elisa F. Kendall
OWL Primer Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL Jeremy Carroll
A suggestion for the resolution of ISSUE-3 (anonymous individuals) Boris Motik
Re: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Jeremy Carroll
Re: No TF meeting this coming monday Deborah L. McGuinness

Sunday, 2 March 2008

RE: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent Michael Schneider
Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent Rinke Hoekstra
Re: ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent Rinke Hoekstra
ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 1 March 2008

RE: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Michael Schneider
RE: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2008 23:42:42 UTC