public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2008 by date

Friday, 29 February 2008

Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL Jeremy Carroll
Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL Jeff Z. Pan
Re: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Uli Sattler
Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL Jeremy Carroll
ISSUE-3 and SPARQL Jeremy Carroll
Re: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Jim Hendler
RE: completeness Giorgos Stoilos
RE: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Michael Schneider
ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment Jeremy Carroll
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
RE: completeness Michael Schneider

Thursday, 28 February 2008

Re: completeness Jim Hendler
Re: completeness Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Fragments Ian Horrocks
Re: UFDTF: Primer. Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Ian Horrocks
Re: Fragments Jim Hendler
Re: Fragments Alan Wu
RE: timed IRC log Michael Schneider
Re: timed IRC log Sandro Hawke
Re: Fwd: Fragments Jeff Z. Pan
Re: timed IRC log Elisa F. Kendall
Re: completeness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: timed IRC log Michael Schneider
UFDTF: Primer. Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Jeremy Carroll
timed IRC log Jeremy Carroll
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Boris Motik
Re: Fragments Carsten Lutz
RE: completeness Giorgos Stoilos

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

Re: Fragments Jim Hendler
Fwd: Fragments Ian Horrocks
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Michael Schneider
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Uli Sattler
Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Uli Sattler
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Boris Motik
Re: Action 91 and issue 95 Bijan Parsia
Re: Action 91 and issue 95 Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: Action 91 and issue 95 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Action 91 and issue 95 Evan Wallace
Re: more FPWDs? Ivan Herman
Re: more FPWDs? Jeremy Carroll
Re: more FPWDs? Bijan Parsia
Re: more FPWDs? Jeremy Carroll
Re: more FPWDs? Bijan Parsia
Re: more FPWDs? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Jeremy Carroll
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Alan Ruttenberg
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Ivan Herman
RE: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Michael Schneider
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Jeremy Carroll
FYI: SWCLOS Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 26 February 2008

Call for Comments: SKOS Primer: W3C Working Draft 21 February 2008 Antoine Isaac
RE: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Michael Schneider
ISSUE-95: Proposal for recursive DatatypeRestrictionS [WAS: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008] Michael Schneider
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 Evan Wallace
Re: Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review Alan Wu
Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Jeremy Carroll
more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Possible new public working draft? Jeremy Carroll
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
Re: Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review Ivan Herman
Re: completeness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review Alan Wu
Possible new public working draft? Boris Motik
Re: completeness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) Michael Schneider

Monday, 25 February 2008

RE: ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) Michael Schneider
Re: completeness Alan Wu
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Jeremy Carroll
RE: completeness Michael Schneider

Friday, 22 February 2008

Next week's agenda Ian Horrocks
Fragments Ian Horrocks
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Jim Hendler
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Achille Fokoue
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Bijan Parsia
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Jeremy Carroll
Re: completeness Jeremy Carroll
Re: completeness Jim Hendler
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
No TF meeting this coming monday Alan Ruttenberg
Re: completeness Bijan Parsia
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
Re: completeness Bijan Parsia
Re: completeness Bijan Parsia
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
RE: completeness Michael Schneider

Thursday, 21 February 2008

Re: Fragments discussion, continued Achille Fokoue
Re: completeness Alan Wu
Re: completeness Ian Horrocks
Re: completeness Jim Hendler
Re: completeness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: completeness Jim Hendler
Re: completeness Alan Wu
Re: completeness Bijan Parsia
Re: completeness Bijan Parsia
RE: completeness Michael Schneider
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Jim Hendler
Re: completeness Jim Hendler
Re: completeness Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Jim Hendler
Re: ISSUE-68 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

completeness Ulrike Sattler
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Boris Motik
Re: Fragments discussion, continued dlmcg1@aol.com
Re: Fragments discussion, continued Achille Fokoue
RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Michael Schneider
Re: OWL teleconference heads up Peter F. Patel-Schneider
OWL teleconference heads up Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

RE: Fragments discussion, continued Carsten Lutz
RE: Fragments discussion, continued Boris Motik
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 20th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
Fragments discussion, continued Alan Ruttenberg
RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Boris Motik

Monday, 18 February 2008

RE: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full Michael Schneider
Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full Alan Ruttenberg
RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Michael Schneider
Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Bijan Parsia
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Carsten Lutz
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Ivan Herman
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Alan Ruttenberg
Draft OWL Lite resolution path ACTION-87 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Alan Ruttenberg
Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 15 February 2008

RE: pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] Michael Schneider
OWLED 2008 DC Registration Open Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Jeremy Carroll
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Uli Sattler
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Jeremy Carroll
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Carsten Lutz
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Carsten Lutz
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Carsten Lutz
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Vojtech Svatek

Thursday, 14 February 2008

RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Boris Motik
Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track Jim Hendler
Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Jeremy Carroll
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jeremy Carroll
QA guidance on fragments Jeremy Carroll
owl lite and punning Jeremy Carroll
Re: pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] Ivan Herman
pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] Michael Schneider
A thought on fragments and rec-track Carsten Lutz

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax Boris Motik
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Boris Motik
Re: different kinds of semantics Alan Ruttenberg
Re: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) Alan Ruttenberg
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Alan Wu
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 Alan Ruttenberg
Re: issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 Rinke Hoekstra
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jeremy Carroll
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 Elisa F. Kendall
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Ivan Herman
RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Michael Schneider
No imports task force meeting this coming monday Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

wiki permissions Sandro Hawke
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Ian Horrocks
issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping Jeremy Carroll
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full Jim Hendler
Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full Jim Hendler
[ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full Michael Schneider
[UFDTF] new version of OWL Primer available Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 11 February 2008

correction to minutes 6th Feb Jeremy Carroll
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jeremy Carroll
Re: different kinds of semantics Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 10 February 2008

Saturday, 9 February 2008

RE: different kinds of semantics Kashyap, Vipul
Re: different kinds of semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: different kinds of semantics Kashyap, Vipul
different kinds of semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 8 February 2008

Reminder: UFDTF Teleconference, Monday February 11 2008, 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
Observers at Washington F2F Ian Horrocks
Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics Ian Horrocks
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Ivan Herman
Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: the other DAML+OIL semantics Michael Schneider
Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics Jeremy Carroll
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler

Thursday, 7 February 2008

RE: the other DAML+OIL semantics Michael Schneider
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Ian Horrocks
Re: proposal for ISSUE-3 (ACTION-81) Jeremy Carroll
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jeremy Carroll
Re: A description of a relationship between pD*-lie fragments of OWL and DLP Carsten Lutz
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Michael Schneider
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 6 February 2008

Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) Michael Smith
RE: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) Michael Schneider
OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action Jim Hendler
Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) Michael Smith
proposal for ISSUE-3 (ACTION-81) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
minutes for 30 January 2008) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: imports Boris Motik
Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) Bijan Parsia
RE: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) Michael Schneider
Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) Alan Ruttenberg
Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Possible backwards compatibility issue with the RDF-to-FS mapping Michael Schneider
Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 Dlmcg1@aol.com
RE: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 5 February 2008

Re: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) Bijan Parsia
Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) Michael Schneider
Agenda for 2008.02.06 Alan Ruttenberg
A description of a relationship between pD*-lie fragments of OWL and DLP Boris Motik
Re: Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion Jim Hendler

Monday, 4 February 2008

Re: Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion Jim Hendler
Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion Alan Ruttenberg
imports Jeremy Carroll
RE: [UFDTF] My action to compare documents - a starting point for discussion tomorrow Kashyap, Vipul
RE: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Michael Schneider
Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Jeremy Carroll
Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Rinke Hoekstra
(URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 1 February 2008

Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday Alan Ruttenberg
RE: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Michael Schneider
Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Fragments discussion Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Michael Schneider

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 21:21:33 UTC