- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:29:18 -0400
- To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I also like this idea (and would join a user facing tf if the group creates one) - the main reason I think this would be a good idea is that Peter's email to this list [1] with the list of new vocabulary terms makes it much easier for some of us to understand the technical documents - and sharing more info (and getting feedback) on what is in OWL1.1 seems to me an important piece of gathering input - and many people (including me) do not have the patience (or ability) to work out all of this from the complex documents -- eventually I hope we will have examples of the use of each feature, but till then, at least knowing what the language comes out like is helpful in understanding the technical stuff - at least to dummies like me -JH On Oct 30, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > > >> - to be readable by a wider audience than the other FPWDs >> - to allow this wider audience to understand the intended >> direction of >> the WG >> - to allow this wider audience to help adjust the direction of the WG >> before we have done a lot of work as a WG > >> This would allow comments along the lines of: >> - have you considered this other possible new feature? >> - that feature looks like a lot of work, and the motivation looks >> a bit >> skimpy? >> - is that feature really needed? > > [VK] This is great! > Some key contributions could also be: > - To convey the value proposition of OWL 1.1 in various usage > scenarios > - To help determine aspects of OWL 1.1 constructs that may not be > useful or even > disadvantageous in an operational context. > > ---Vipul > > > The information transmitted in this electronic communication is > intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and > may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, > retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any > action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities > other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine > at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information. > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?." - Albert Einstein Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:32:27 UTC