Re: comments on RDF mapping

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
• To: vit.novacek@deri.org
• Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, rector@cs.man.ac.uk
• Message-Id: <20071030.124619.185799179.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: "Novacek, Vit" <vit.novacek@deri.org>
Subject: RE: comments on RDF mapping
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:17:39 -0000

> 
> 
> >   Anyway, this is a long way to say that I second the idea that we  
> > might want to revisit annotations w/respect to allowing a "minimal"  
> > semantics to them - so it woudln't break DL implementations, but  
> > would allow this feature to be more widely used by tools.
> 
> +1
> 
> Cheers,
> Vit

As you are agreeing, presumably you have some example tools and uses.
Could you share them with the WG?

Thanks,

peter

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 16:57:36 UTC