- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:31:17 -0700
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <Ian.Horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
I commented to Sandro privately, but since we are going ahead I'll put a note in here: The div and span markup for character styling, e.g. for names, terminals, etc, are painful to edit when in a wiki frame of mind, so I'd like to find a more wiki-like way of doing them - either with templates or some other mechanism. This doesn't block progress. When we figure out to handle it, we would just fix the text to use the new mechanism. -Alan On Oct 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > >>> I think that it is "ready for prime time", i.e., that we can use >>> this >>> mechanism to transition the documents for real, and start editing. >> >> Agreed. Let's do it. > > Okay, done. I moved the issues over to the talk page. > > Can you tell me what that page should really be named in the wiki, and > what the other documents should be named in the wiki? > > The OWL 1.1 site has: > <dt><a href="overview.html">Overview</a></dt> > <dt><a href="owl_specification.html">Structural Specification and > Functional-Style Syntax</a></dt> > <dt><a href="metamodel.html">MOF-Based Metamodel</a></dt> > <dt><a href="semantics.html">Model-Theoretic Semantics</a></dt> > > <dt><a href="xml_syntax.html">XML Syntax</a></dt> > <dt><a href="rdf_mapping.html">Mapping to RDF Graphs</a></dt> > <dt><a href="tractable.html">Tractable Fragments</a></dt> > > which is where I got "Specification" as the short name, but I'd love > something which conveys more information. I guess the term "Abstract > Syntax" is being frowned upon now? Maybe "Syntactic Structures"? > > (it's not hard to change later, but if y'all know now, that'd be > cool.) > > -- Sandro >
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 14:31:34 UTC