- From: Ian Horrocks <Ian.Horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:56:31 +0100
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Nice! - pity we will have change it back into html at the end. I had the same question as Peter w.r.t. the title and subtitle -- as well as the layout not looking right, the section numbers end up being a bit strange when you do it this way (everything is 1.x). Thanks, Ian On 26 Oct 2007, at 10:09, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > Looks good. I like having one page for the document (even though > MediWiki puts in gratuitous warnings about the page being too big for > some browsers). > > A number of minor issues: > > - How are we going to handle the real title? (Can we have a page with > the real title, <br> included, as topic and link there?) I tried > using an <h1>, but this doesn't work very well. > > - The OWL WG navigation bar shows up on the left of the document, > taking > up valuable screen space. Is there a way to get rid of it? > > peter > > > > From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> > Subject: managing the documents as wiki pages > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:53:53 -0400 > >> >> >> I took a pass at converting SSAFSS [1] into a Wiki page: >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Specification >> >> Take a look and let me know how it looks. (I've run an HTML diff, so >> I'm fairly confident the text is the same. The conversation was 90% >> automatic.) >> >> I'm optimistic about just have each document be one Wiki page and >> having >> the conversion for publication be quite trivial. >> >> -- Sandro >> >> [1] http://www.webont.org/owl/1.1/owl_specification.html >> >
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 09:56:38 UTC