- From: OWL <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:17:21 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-5: REPORTED: Doubts about n-ary datatypes
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
Raised by: Bijan Parsia
On product:
From: http://code.google.com/p/owl1-1/issues/detail?id=12
Reported by bparsia, Mar 29, 2007
See:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JanMar/0162.html>
Brief summary (even if you dump datatype groups, which were not intended to be part of OWL 1.1; this should be clarified): N-ary datatypes seem both fragile and wrongly expressive (as compared, e.g., to dl-safe rules with built-ins). The key example is unit conversions.
Comment 1 by bparsia, Mar 29, 2007
Also, there are no built-in n-ary datatypes, nor a language for defining them. E.g., see:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JanMar/0104.html>
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 20:17:28 UTC