- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:54:42 -0400 (EDT)
- To: hendler@cs.rpi.edu
- Cc: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu> Subject: Re: Publication proposal discussion summary Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:30:21 -0400 > > [snip] > > > * Jim expressed opposition to the structural specification *per se*: > > <http://www.w3.org/mid/F9A27E86-A5E8-4D40-8E77- > > FE17CF9F0247@cs.rpi.edu> > > > > I'm unclear whether this means he objects to its publication for > > review. > > I object to its publication for review prior to further WG discussion > (for now that is "object" in the sense of don't agree, if pushed it > can become "object" in the WG sense, but I hope that won't be > necessary given that there seems to be support for the idea of more > internal review) What would cause you to lift this objection? Suppose, for example, that no other WG member objected to publication. Would that suffice to show that there has been sufficient discussion? [...] > -Jim Hendler peter
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 15:03:52 UTC