- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:49:32 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I am discharging and unrecorded issue with this email. The OWL 1.1 issues list is managed through the Google Code project's issue list: http://code.google.com/p/owl1-1/issues/list At the moment, this is open to anyone who has a google id (i.e., they don't need to be a member of the group). We have encouraged everyone interested to post issues to that list and the admins and editors have disposed of the issues in a variety of ways. In the working group, only the chairs can formally raise (or reopen) an issue. However, I still think it's really convenient to use an issue tracker to manage proposed issues. Otherwise, we have to watch email a lot and things get harder to manage, esp. if at one point we don't open an issue but later we think we should. The Tracker tool: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/ http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ makes this a bit easier by watching IRC and our mailing list. I would like that we use e.g., Tracker in a world open way and ask people who really want to raise issues to put them in that issue management tool. The chairs then can dispose of proposed issues by either accepting/opening them or declining to do so. Sandro is investigating whether Tracker can be extended to handle this methodology. I guess the main point is whether the group agrees that the interface to the general world should be an issue management system. If so, then we can implement it however we want. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 17:48:21 UTC