- From: Leila Bayoudhi <bayoudhileila@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "public-owl-dev@w3.org" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 02:18:24 UTC
Dear Community,Please, I have two main concerns: 1/ In an academic document such as PhD dissertation about ontologies in the OWL 2 DL language. 1-1/ When speaking about formal semantics, Can I speak just of the SROIQ(D) semantics without referring to W3C OWL 2 Direct semantics web page? 2-1/ For the reasoning services, Can I speak just of those of description logic (when I present the description Logic language) or I outline the reasoning services, when I speak about both DL and OWL 2 DL? 2/ If I speak about the reasoning services when working with OWL2 DL ontologies: Can I just speak about unsatisfiability of classes OR also of object and data properties? I know that both alternatives in the two cases refer to the same thing, but I look for the precision and the easy following of the reader. Thank you very much in advance for answering me | | Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com |
Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 02:18:24 UTC