- From: Bijan Parsia <bijan.parsia@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 15:28:22 +0000
- To: Leila Bayoudhi <bayoudhileila@yahoo.fr>
- CC: "public-owl-dev@w3.org" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2018 15:28:56 UTC
First, without an individual or Top, you aren't going to get an inconsistency. An unsatisfiable class, sure. An inconsistency, no. On Mar 4, 2018, at 15:03, Leila Bayoudhi <bayoudhileila@yahoo.fr<mailto:bayoudhileila@yahoo.fr>> wrote: Hi, In the literature, I found that this set of axioms may cause an inconsistency, though I am not convinced. SubClassOf(C1 C2) SubClassOf(Ci C1) SubClassOf(Cj C2) DisjointClasses(Ci Cj) I don't know why anyone would say that this is inconsistent. It's not even incoherent (ie all the classes are satisfiable). Maybe you transcribed it wrong? I tried this ontology using protégé, I ran the reasoner,but no inconsistency was detected. Please, tell me if this sub-ontology contains a meaningless (because I don't think that is meaningless or inconsistent). Thank you for confirming my thoughts. Regards.
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2018 15:28:56 UTC