- From: Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:40:07 +0400
- To: System Bridge <sysbri1@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFxxROQ8+V9=j-hD7aeAmQ_R=fGxNbZ=j5wmy1puQRnEfYCLcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To keep it simple the relationship "pouring" is of 3 arguments: e_bottle, liquide, b_with_l with an axiom pouring(e_bottle, liquide, b_with_l) implies liquide_in(b_with_l)=liquide and bottle_of(b_with_l)=e_bottle 2013/9/9 System Bridge <sysbri1@gmail.com> > Hello, > > we are group of PHD students and we would like to ask you (ontology > experts) for help/advice. > > We`re trying to make a simple expert system using ontology as knowledge > base. We have come to few problems and before making any conclusions, we > would like to confront it with you. > > We noticed that every explanation and example we found uses object > hierarchy, e.g. OneThing isPartOf OtherThing or OneThing hasPart > OtherThings. We don`t know how to model process which also causes that > resulting object will be assembled from some other objects. For example: > > a) Object Empty bottle > b) Object Liquid > c) Process: Liquid will be poured into the Empty bottle and thus will > create some new object Bottle filled with liquid - see image attached. > > > What we need is to define a relation “Pouring” that is between liquid and > empty bottle. In fact we don’t really need “is part of” relations if there > is a way to express “is part of” implicitly in “Pouring” relation, because > it is obvious that the "Bottle with liquid" was created by "Pouring" the > "Liquid" into the "Empty bottle". Also the direction of "Pouring" is > important for us. > > So, the question is whether you may help us either by explaining this > particular example or providing us with helpful source of information how > to solve it. > > Thanks in advance > > Your sincerely > > Sybri team, University of Zilina, Slovakia[image: Inline image 1] >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: ff.png
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 04:40:34 UTC