- From: Marķa Poveda <mpoveda@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:06:29 +0100
- To: undisclosed-recipients:;
- Message-ID: <CA+mx6Z08XmvZgOSzsrtnSrA9pyYO_fp=s1s9GLPJ_gZrNaqFWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, since we made available our ontology evaluation tool OOPS! [1] several users have asked for indicators about how critical each pitfall is. Up to now the pitfall catalogue maintained within OOPS! [2] contains 35 pitfalls. In order to improve the catalogue and the tool we are going to associate an indicator to each pitfall according to their possible negative consequences. For doing so, we would like to take ontology developers, people with background or interest in ontology evaluation and ontology modelling, and OOPS! users opinions into account. We'd be happy if you take the time to fill in the questionnaire here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFBqT1N1a3dHQWZ2SjJOeG41OTliaXc6MQ#gid=0 The questionnaire takes you less than 20 minutes, it can be answered anonymously and will be open until the *22nd of February*. We will publish the survey results and update OOPS! according to such results. For any further information please contact us via e-mail ( oops@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es) Thank you very much for your help and cooperation! Best, Marķa and Mari Carmen [1] http://www.oeg-upm.net/oops [2] http://www.oeg-upm.net/oops/catalogue.jsp P.D: Please forward this email to any person interested in this topic you might know
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 15:07:16 UTC