- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:28:19 -0400
- To: Markus Krötzsch <markus.kroetzsch@cs.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: zhutchok@ebi.ac.uk, public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Markus Krötzsch <markus.kroetzsch@cs.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > What you describe for Protege seems to be a rather unfortunate approach that > leads to an escaping that is not invertible. It is not. He didn't specify what the namespace "smth:" expands to. -Alan
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2011 17:29:18 UTC