- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:07:40 +0100
- To: Jonathan Conrad <jcsneaker@googlemail.com>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On 4 Jul 2011, at 20:23, Jonathan Conrad wrote: > hello everyone, > > I want to model things being connected, ie reachable from each other. > For this i have a transitive "reachable" property which works fine > alone. > > For the reachability to be valid in certain cases i must also check > if every individual in the transitive chain has a certain > dataproperty like "canHoldMaximumWeight > 5". > Example: > A -reaches-> B -reaches-> C > A hasMaximumWeight 3 > B hasMaximumWeight 2 > C hasMaximumWeight 4 > > So i want to ask all individuals that are reachable from A, but only > using individuals that can hold a weight of 3 or greater. > If i try to write this in DL: hasMaximumWeight some integer [>=3] > and reaches some Thing. what happens if you add a conjunct with 'only'? Because, as you say, you want all individuals that are reachable from A, but only using individuals that, i.e., as hasMaximumWeight some integer [>=3] and hasMaximumWeight only integer [>=3] and reaches some Thing. now one thing that isn't clear is where the 'A' has gone in your query - that might need fixing. If you know about predicate logic, the 'some' is a (guarded) existential quantifier, and the 'only' a (guarded) universal one -- and your query clearly asks for at least the universal one. Cheers, Uli > I get the answer of C, but the only way to reach C is through B, > which i want to exclude from the "transitivity" because of the > weight issue > > Is this possible in OWL (using Protege?)? Am I going all wrong about > the modelling of this? > I have found property chains, but as far as i see i can only combine > object properties this way and not mix them with data properties!? > > Thanks, > Jonathan > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 16:07:37 UTC