Re: ANN: SPARQL-DL query engine for the OWL API

Thanks for the feedback.
We have decided to stick to the original name SPARQL-DL for now -- even 
knowing that this might not be the best identifier -- and we will see 
which direction the project will take.

TL

Am 10.03.11 17:45, schrieb Alan Ruttenberg:
> I concur with Bijan.
>
> 2c,
>
> -Alan
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Bijan Parsia<bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>  wrote:
>> Aha.
>>
>> One thing I WOULD suggest is supporting normal BGP patterns as well, so as to have a compliant mode. This shouldn't be TOO huge an implementation burden relative to what you've done.
>>
>> Then I would explain on the front page that you offer two syntaxes: Standard SPARQL BGP and a more OWL user friendly MSish based syntax. (It's not really MS syntax...my memory failed! :) That' the abstract syntax. A MS based one perhaps would be better since it would allow cnp between e.g., protege's DL Query tab and your implementation.)
>>
>> I would suggest that we build an online converter between the two.
>>
>> We should think a bit about the wire protocol issues and perhaps service descriptions.
>>
>> In short, let's address whatever issues there are rather than create a new suite of issues by generating a new name!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bian.
>>
>
>

--
Dr. Thorsten Liebig
Phone +49 731 502 4207
mailto:liebig@derivo.de

derivo GmbH <http://www.derivo.de>
James-Franck-Ring, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Amtsgericht Ulm, HRB 725444
CEO: Dr. Thorsten Liebig