- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 11:33:36 +1000
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Hi Thorsten (and others), have you considered that SPARQL-DL may not be a good name for a technology that has an entirely different syntax and semantics from SPARQL? When I looked at this, I expected to find a DL-friendly subset of SPARQL. But this is not what SPARQL-DL is. I believe there is enough confusion on the marketplace already. Why not call it something like OWL-QL? Thanks, Holger On Mar 3, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Thorsten Liebig wrote: > We are happy to announce the initial release of our SPARQL-DL query engine that is settled on top of the OWL API. The library is aligned with the OWL 2 standard and adds a SPARQL-DL interface to every OWL API 3 reasoner. > > Release 1.0.0 and accompanying documentation can be found at: > http://www.derivo.de/en/resources/sparql-dl-api/ > > Best, > The RDF/OWL team at derivo > > -- > Dr. Thorsten Liebig > Phone +49 731 502 4207 > mailto:liebig@derivo.de > > derivo GmbH <http://www.derivo.de> > James-Franck-Ring, 89081 Ulm, Germany > Amtsgericht Ulm, HRB 725444 > CEO: Dr. Thorsten Liebig > >
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2011 01:34:18 UTC