- From: Mitch Kokar <mkokar@vistology.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:23:23 -0400
- To: Elisa Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Cc: UML-OWL Gen <info@umlowlgen.com>, 'Bijan Parsia' <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
And going one more step back in the history of ODM, we had a paper published on the issues of the UML-OWL mapping in 2002: K. Baclawski, M. M. Kokar, P. A. Kogut, L. Hart, J. Smith, J. Letkowski, and P. Emery. Extending the unified modeling language for ontology development. Software and Systems Modeling, 1, 2:142-156, 2002. @article{Baclawski+02, author = {Baclawski, K. and Kokar, M. M. and Kogut, P. A. and Hart, L. and Smith, J. and Letkowski, J. and Emery, P.}, title = {Extending the Unified Modeling Language for Ontology Development}, journal = {Software and Systems Modeling}, volume = {1, 2}, pages = {142--156}, year = 2002 } ===Mitch Kokar On May 4, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Elisa Kendall wrote: In addition to our ODM work, which does include a mapping chapter describing a number of issues and approaches for mapping from UML to OWL (in addition to the language metamodel and profiles which would facilitate this process), there is prior art from AT&T Federal systems in the form of a set of tools they developed more than 5 years ago with Lockheed Martin that supported a direct mapping from UML to OWL and back. The tools were documented in a number of papers, released in late 2004 as an open source project, which is still available at http://projects.semwebcentral.org/projects/codip/ .. The Duet project was early work, but was effective at taking vanilla UML models, without benefit of the ODM metamodel or profile mappings, and producing OWL. Best regards, Elisa UML-OWL Gen wrote: > Bijan, > We'll take your sarcastic feedback in positive way, even it wasn't. > > The generator is "Patent Pending", so you will not find in Google > for a year > period. > > This work is different from Elisa's work, where her work is more > about ODM, > UML-OWL Generator has nothing to do with ODM. > The generator works only from UML to OWL, and the unique thing about > it is > how it deals with complex UML models & metamodels of multiple > packages, not > toy examples as most literatures ended up with. > > We would be happy if you point us at any product of one of "many > literatures" that works in real production environment. > > We appreciate your feedback on the website, we will add a web > service for > "Try It" to support interactive test, and will make models and > ontologies > available on "Test Case". > > Thanks, > > UML-OWL Team info@umlowlgen.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-dev-request@w3.org > ] > On Behalf Of Bijan Parsia > Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 5:47 AM > To: UML-OWL Gen > Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org; Elisa F. Kendall > Subject: Re: UML-OWL Generator, A product to convert UML into OWL > > Well, I hate to be the first pile on, buuuuuuut... > > ...what do you think you are patenting? It's hard to see anything > patentable here. What is patentable doesn't seem worth patenting > and certainly not worth the antipathy that 1) patenting and 2) > pimping your prima facie silly patenting generates. > > (Given the many mapping of UML to OWL in the literature, I would be > interested to know what you thought was novel.) > > I couldn't fine your patent in google's patent search, but I did find: > http://www.google.com/patents?id=NR6XAAAAEBAJ > though Elisa is a member of the OWL WG thus, presumably, is going > to be somewhat RANDy about this. I guess that one is going "the > other way", i.e., OWL to UML. > > Finally, having your "try it" be "email us stuff and we'll email > you stuff back in 24 hrs": > http://www.umlowlgen.com/index.php?p=1_4_Try-It- > is...well, silly. Why not set up an actual, if limited, web service? > > Similarly, your "test case" consists of a screen shot and a set of > stats...why not have the actual models/ontologies available for > download? > > Finally, I don't see any pricing, download, or sales contact. > > Not auspicious. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 11:25:48 UTC