- From: Marcel Ferrante <marcelf@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:35:56 -0200
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <920c1d2b0812260235n2327272bic896d5c7a581301@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Elisa, Im reading the ODM specification and a important point is the ODM is necessary because UML doesnt have semantic enough to represent completely a ontology model like OWL DL. But, I read the OWLbase metamodel and I cant see a *new symbol* from UML created to these situations. Maybe because I dont expert in UML either...So can you indicate it for me ? Thanks a lot, Marcel 2008/12/20 Elisa Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com> > > >> The closest thing to a standardized graphical notation is the OMG work: >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/UML_Concrete_Syntax >> >> This may be revised in light of OWL 2. >> >> > Thanks for the plug, Bijan :). This prompted me to revise the page, linked > above, which now reflects links to the latest version of the ODM, now a > formally adopted OMG standard, etc. > > Evan Wallace and I gave a tutorial on this awhile back at an OMG meeting, > and are planning to update it for the March 2009 OMG meeting in Washington > DC. If anyone is interested, let me know and I can provide details on the > meeting or the old slides, as desired. > > Best regards, > > Elisa > > -- Marcel Ferrante Silva Doutorando em Ciência da Informação - ECI/UFMG www.finaltec.com.br +55 31 8851-9069 2626-2859 MSN: marcelferrante@hotmail.com
Received on Friday, 26 December 2008 10:36:31 UTC