- From: Jeff Thompson <jeff@thefirst.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:49:07 -0800
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
In mapping OWL to RDF graphs, to make an annotation on a triple, the triple is reified into separate subject, predicate and object assertions similar to reification in RDF. _:x rdf:type owl:Annotation _:x owl:subject T(y) _:x owl:predicate T(AP) _:x owl:object T(av) But Tim Berners-Lee is still saying that reification in RDF is broken. See this message from last year: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Jan/0088.html If reification in RDF is broken, and OWL adopts the same method for quoting a triple so that it can be annotated, does OWL inherit the same problems Tim has been talking about for all these years? - Jeff
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 16:49:51 UTC