- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:19:50 +0100
- To: Jeff Thompson <jeff@thefirst.org>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Aug 2, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Jeff Thompson wrote: > > Consider the rule that if X desires Y and X can_do Y, then X does Y. > In Prolog, this would be: > > does(X, Y) :- desires(X, Y), can_do(X, Y). > > This is really defining 'does' as the intersection of the > properties 'desires' and 'can_do'. > I couldn't find something like this in the OWL use cases. Is there > a way to do this in OWL2? does subPropertyOf desires. does subPropertyOf can_do. ? Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2008 23:20:38 UTC