- From: Marco Colombetti <colombet@elet.polimi.it>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:00:13 +0100
- To: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 16:36:23 UTC
I'm kind of dissatisfied with the use of the terms "assertion" and "declaration" in the OWL literature. Axioms like DisjointClasses(C,D) are often called "class assertions", and axioms like FunctionalObjectProperty(P) are called "(object) property assertions". Unfortunately, also Abox assertions like ClassAssertion(a C) are called "class assertion"s, and Abox assertions like ObjectPropertyAssertion(P a b) are called (object) "property assertions". The former type of assertions are sometimes called "declarations", but unfortunately OWL has a different notion of declaration, like Declaration(OWLClass(A)). Any suggestion on how to call axioms like DisjointClasses(C,D) and FunctionalObjectProperty(P) without creating confusion? Marco Colombetti
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 16:36:23 UTC