- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:38:09 +0000
- To: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
The wikipedia page on OWL is pretty underdeveloped: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Ontology_Language It has no examples; it contains irrelevant detail (do we need to know who the chairs were or that Jeff led the requirements effort...or that there was a requirements effort led?) Does all the talk of the sublanguages and their interactions make sense without any examples of the language itself? Compare with the MathML page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML The list of links and reference is rather strange as well. Do we really need to have so much (or anything) on the name? Etc. etc. It would be nice if the OWL page were more respectable and useful. Any public-owl-dev denizen's up for the task? It seems as important as any of the user/outreach documentation the working group is considering. Step up and doing something meaningful! And after you've finished donating to worthy causes, work on the OWL Wikipedia page! Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 20:38:24 UTC