- From: John McClure <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:04:32 -0700
- To: "Owl Dev" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
A Person in US legal contexts is either a Human or a Corporation; every Human is a Person, and every Corporation is a Person. Is the following construct valid? Will or should reasoners be troubled by <rdf:Alt> within a <rdfs:range>, and can or should <rdf:Alt> be used within an <owl:Restriction>? <owl:Class rdf:about="#LegalPerson"> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about='#Parent'> <rdfs:range> <rdf:Alt> <li><owl:Class rdf:about="#Human"/></li> <li><owl:Class rdf:about="#Corporation"/></li> </rdf:Alt> </rdfs:range> </owl:ObjectProperty> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:maxCardinality rdf:value='1'/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> </owl:Class> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Human"> <owl:subClassOf rdf:resource="#LegalPerson"/> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:about="#Human"/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:maxCardinality rdf:value='2'/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> </owl:Class> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Corporation"> <owl:subClassOf rdf:resource="#LegalPerson"/> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:about="#Corporation"/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:maxCardinality rdf:value='1'/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> </owl:Class> I haven't found examples of this sort in the docs. I understand that an <rdfs:range> is nothing more than <!-- alternative specification for rdfs:range--> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#Parent"/> <owl:allValuesFrom> <rdf:Alt> <li><owl:Class rdf:about="#Human"/></li> <li><owl:Class rdf:about="#Corporation"/></li> </rdf:Alt> </owl:allValuesFrom> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> Maybe there is a better way to model this? Maybe I should be asking this in another forum? Thanks for any comments, John McClure
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 19:04:06 UTC