- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:49:08 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Michael Schneider" <m_schnei@gmx.de>, public-owl-dev@w3.org, bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk
Does it break it, or does it make the OWL-1.1 entailments only be a subset of OWL-Full entailments. If it breaks, could you say how please? -Alan On Aug 9, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > Not really. Im sure it was meant to have this intention, but the > effect of moving to punning is two-fold: it breaks the OWL Full > semantics, and it breaks the semantic connection between OWL and > RDF. Neither of which are desirable, IMO, though both of them are > in line with a certain perspective that has long been associated > with Manchester
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 16:49:19 UTC