RE: owl11 namespace?

Hello,

Yes, I'm sorry about that. I'll fix the Web site shortly.

Sincerely yours,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-dev-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthew Horridge
> Sent: 20 February 2007 17:28
> To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: owl11 namespace?
> 
> 
> I noticed that there is new vocabulary for symmetric property.  Is
> this just a typo?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Matthew
> 
> > At first we dumped all the new vocabulary into the old OWL namespaces;
> > however, the W3C people objected to that, so we had to change all
> > specifications about ten days ago. The list of namespaces is now
> > sanctioned
> > by the W3C and can be found in the following document:
> >
> > http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/owl_specification.html
> >
> > Sincerely yours,
> >
> > 	Boris
> >
> > P.S.: OK, I agree we should probably put all relevant namespaces
> > into each
> > respective document; I'm sorry for the confusion.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-owl-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-dev-
> >> request@w3.org]
> >> On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
> >> Sent: 20 February 2007 04:39
> >> To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
> >> Subject: owl11 namespace?
> >>
> >>
> >> The latest RDF mapping document introduces a new namespace prefix
> >> "owl11" for the additional non-OWL 1.0 system resources.  I could not
> >> find a reference to what URI this stands for.  Could we (as tool
> >> builders at least) agree on a common URI for this vocabulary?
> >>
> >> Holger
> >
> >
> >
>

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 17:33:13 UTC