Re: axiom URIs

>On 23 Jan 2007, at 16:12, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>>>Oh, thinking about this some more reminded me of something.
>>>
>>>One (alternative) way to serialize axiom annotations would be to 
>>>embed them in XMLLiterals. Then it'd be quite easy to have URIs 
>>>(or not) for axioms (though this identity would be independent of 
>>>the content...yuck!)
>>
>>Why XMLLiterals?
>
>Going with the most specific appropriate type and trying to stick 
>with built in types? Also, I keep hoping RDF toolkits will get 
>better at dealing with XMLLiterals :)
>

OK; and of course if you want to include the axiom itself (indeed I 
did misunderstand) then XML is more, er, structured than plain text.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:08:33 UTC