- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:03:43 -0600
- To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 09:22 +0000, Ian Horrocks wrote: [...] > I also had some misgivings about this, but you will note that the > charter says that the WG does not *plan* to have f2f meetings, not > that it can't have them. That's pretty much the same thing. People deserve to know how much travel to budget when they join the WG. If you want to reserve the option to have face-to-face meetings, put something like "0 to 3 face-to-face meetings per year". Otherwise, it might take a charter change for the group to have ftf meetings. I'm partial to the "no face to face meetings" plan, but I can't be sure whether that's wisdom or travel/meeting fatigue talking. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 14:03:50 UTC