- From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:51:33 -0500
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 16:51:37 UTC
Hi Bijan, On 4/18/07, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Just a few days ago, we had an analog discussion for rdf:List and > > friends here in the "Restrictions on Bags and Seqs content" thread, > > remember? > > I've not finished my message for that, but short answer from me is > that I think, even for RDF, Bags and Seqs are known to be broken, and > rdf:List is not a good idea. Historically, I believe rdf:List was > introduced in order to encode DAML+OIL syntax in the first place. > I have my own ideas about problems with Containers, but do you have some references for what you mean by "known" to be broken please? Similarly, why is rdf:List not a good idea? Of course, the question then becomes, what do you think *should* be used? I have a couple of practical approaches for specific circumstances, but the semantics are lacking. Regards, Paul Gearon
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 16:51:37 UTC