- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:50:52 +0100
- To: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, Boris Motik <bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk>, "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org, "'chris mungall'" <cjm@fruitfly.org>
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Pocock wrote: > If you represent this in the RDF by reifying it, then presumably we > would have > a URI for the axiom, or at least of the reified version of it? You *can* but it's not required, since you can have a bnode. I imagine, but haven't checked, that current tools use (only) Bnodes. The mapping certainly encourages this behavior. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:51:04 UTC