Re: Axiom annotations

On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Pocock wrote:

> If you represent this in the RDF by reifying it, then presumably we  
> would have
> a URI for the axiom, or at least of the reified version of it?

You *can* but it's not required, since you can have a bnode.

I imagine, but haven't checked, that current tools use (only) Bnodes.  
The mapping certainly encourages this behavior.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 11:51:04 UTC