- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:23:02 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
Bijan Parsia wrote: > I have a lonely > preference for literals, but the toolkits have problems with them (and > there are namespace issues I think you've mentioned...you could use an > alternative syntax but then the toolkits just die faster :)). I think this might be the best approach. e.g. _:a a owl11:Annotation . _:a owl11:annotating """ # some turtle that gives the triples being annotated """ . _:a rdfs:comment """ . annotation """ _a dc:creator "Another Annotation" . With the namespaces, probably best to have a single literal somewhere in the document that gives the prefixes explicitly, in turtle and link them in, e.g. with _:a as before _:a owl11:turtleDeclarations _b . _:b a owl11:AnnotationDeclarations . _:b owl11:declarations """ # some turtle to be parsed before the other block of turtle """ . Much more explicitly a hack than reification, which appears to offer more than it does. Like reification, does mean everything gets said twice: once to say it, and once to discuss why/how/who/when said it Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 10:23:32 UTC