- From: Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:52:11 +0200
- To: rogargon@gmail.com
- CC: matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk, alanruttenberg@gmail.com, semantic-web@w3.org, public-owl-dev@w3.org
Hi again, Roberto! Roberto García wrote on Wed, 11 Apr 2007: > The List approach seems more clean but, due to compatibility issues > with XMP, I'm forced to consider Bag and Seq. > > My question is: if I'm not constrained to OWL-DL, is it possible to > constrain rdfs:member in order to simplify the whole thing? If it is ok for you that your ontology will fall into OWL/Full (e.g. if all you want to do is conceptional modeling), then: Yes! 'rdfs:member' is only disallowed vocabulary within OWL/DL. Cheers, Michael
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 20:52:04 UTC