- From: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:59:46 +0100
- To: "'Kaarel Kaljurand'" <kaljurand@gmail.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
> > Dan has acquaintance Pat.
> >
> > In N3, we allow the 'has' to be left out:
> >
> > Dan acquaintance Pat.
>
> How does this pattern work with negation (and other OWL features)?
>
> Dan no acquaintance Pat?
There is no problem negating triples whose property
takes the role-noun form. Just prefix the triple with
not:
not Dan acquaintance Pat
which can be verbalized as "Dan doesn't have Pat as acquaintance"
or "Pat is not acquaintance of Dan".
-Gerd
--------------------------------------------
Gerd Wagner http://rewerse.net/i1
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 20:00:05 UTC