- From: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:52:45 -0500
- To: "Kaarel Kaljurand" <kaljurand@gmail.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1e89d6a40611280452h709e7391ua0bfb83c6913247d@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Karel, Anne & All -- Folks interested in controlled English for OWL may also be interested in a system that supports uncontrolled, open vocabulary, largely open syntax English -- for OWL and other deductive purposes. It's online at the site below. Some OWLish examples are: www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/OwlResearchOnt.agent www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/OwlTest1.agent www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/Wine1.agent www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/FeaReferenceModelOntology2.agent There's also an non-OWL ontology example www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RelBioOntDefn3.agent You are cordially invited to use a browser to write and run your own examples. Thanks for comments, -- Adrian Internet Business Logic (R) Executable open vocabulary English Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free Adrian Walker Reengineering Phone: USA 860 830 2085 On 11/25/06, Kaarel Kaljurand <kaljurand@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > On 11/22/06, Anne Cregan <annec@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > > > > Following on from Manchester's lead and the proposed "Manchester Syntax" > > which was presented at OWL-ED 2006, > > there was some discussion as to the possibility of an extension of this > > approach, using whole English sentences with a controlled vocabulary > > to comprise a syntax which is more intuitively natural for > non-logicians, > > AND has a precise DL semantics. > > what you describe is also one of our goals in the Attempto project > (see: http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/attempto/). We have recently implemented > a program > that converts OWL ontologies into Attempto Controlled English (ACE), see: > > http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/attempto/documentation/OWL_to_ACE/ > > This should give an overview of what we think the controlled natural > language for > expressing OWL should be like. Our claim is that an average user can grasp > the contents of an ontology better if it was presented in ACE rather than > visualized by Protege or similar editors. (We haven't done any experiments > yet to back this up.) > > There is also a description of how to convert ACE texts into OWL: > > http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/attempto/documentation/writing_owl_in_ace.html > > I hope this work contributes to your work. > Comments welcome. > > -- > kaarel > > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 12:53:01 UTC