- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:06:30 +0000
- To: Soonho Kim <soonho.kim@fao.org>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Soonho Kim wrote: > > How are you? > > I am Soonho Kim who is working on Food and Agricultural > Organization of the > United Nation. > Now, I saw the OWL 1.1 provide a metadata facility. In my > understanding, the > metadata is about describing classes and properties on ontology > such as 'who > makes classes/properties', when or why?'. Yes, though this isn't as useful as one might think :) It also provides for annotations on *axioms*. One should note that OWL Full already provides entity annotations (OWL 1.1 provides a "DL friendly, very weak version of that). > I am not sure (or doubt) that the metadata facility in OWL1.1. > could provide > a facility to reuse the current existing metadata such as Dublin Core. You could use punning to do this. > Now, I am creating an ontology which covers existing metadata > such as > Dublin Core(DC) element, DC terms and others, since this ontology > would be > used for cataloguing publications in FAO. > > My bottom line is to 1) reuse the current RDF version of Dublin Core > (keeping the name space) without doing any further refinement, 2) > to keep > OWL DL not OWL FULL, and 3) to use the Dublin Core for inference > (that's why > I don't want to use Protégé Dublin Core ontology in OWL DL, which > adapts the > annotation property providing no inference) > > Can I do the three things using the metadata facility in OWL 1.1? Punning should work for that; it was a primary use case at least I had in mind. Whether it's the *best* way to do this overall, or whether enhancing annotation properties would be better is a subtle question :) > Thanks for your answer in advance: ) Hope this helps. You can experiment with this in the 1.4 (almost) release of Pellet. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 24 November 2006 11:28:22 UTC