- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:56:57 -0600
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Bijan, Thanks for your recent item on the relationship between OWL 1.1 and RDF... http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2006/11/13/not-so-alternate-a-view-of-owl-11/ I it addresses many of the concerns I have that Jim and Ora expressed http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2006/11/11/an-alternative-view-for-owl-11/ http://www.lassila.org/blog/archive/2006/11/more_on_rdf.html Between the 3 of those posts, I feel the urgency to finish my own has gone down to the point where I can collect my thoughts on OWL 1.1 without rushing too much. I'm still thinking about how to reconcile punning, in particular... Oh... and I have been doing some relevant work... Using ACL2 with Semantic Web Data http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2006/Papers/owl-acl2/doc20 I hope to look at the axiomatic semantics Jim mentions in that light. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 19:57:12 UTC