- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:07:50 +0100
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Jim Hendler wrote: > In recent days I've been attending a lot of meetings where I have > been approached by people talking about not just the limitations of > the current OWL (something I've been hearing about for a long time > :-)) but actually talking about proposed technical solutions. I > think it would be good to start to collect some of these and to think > a bit about those things that we might want to see go into some > future OWL version > There's a wide variety of these things going from simple extensions > to OWL (such as adding qualified restrictions, having an > owl:allDisjoint , etc.) to adding some standard ways of doing common > things in other KR langauges (part-whole, bounded transitivity, > probability models) or going beyond to new concepts in Sem Web (new > models of partial import, named ontology segments, etc.) > I'd like to hear what people are working on, or what people need - > this way we'll have these ideas on record for the eventual next > generation of OWL technology. > -Jim H,. I'd certainly like to see some work/clean up of owl:import. I'd even be interested in *doing* it.... :-) Cheers, Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Friday, 15 April 2005 10:08:00 UTC