Possible typo in OWL 2 primer, Manchester syntax

To whom it may concern:

                In http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/, Section 7, Manchester syntax, I believe the example

Class: Teenager
  SubClassOf: hasAge some integer[< 12 , >= 19]
should read

Class: Teenager

  SubClassOf: hasAge some integer[> 12 , <= 19]
to match the restrictions

xsd:minExclusive "12"^^xsd:integer

       xsd:maxInclusive "19"^^xsd:integer
in the functional syntax.  I did not find this noted in the first- or second-edition errata.  If you have any questions, please reply.  My apologies if this message unwittingly duplicates an existing report!

Sincerely,
Chris White

Christopher White | Lee & Hayes
Patent Agent
ChrisW@leehayes.com

P  585.598.5411  |  F  509.323.8979
580 WillowBrook Office Park | Fairport, New York 14450

Follow us! Twitter<https://twitter.com/LeeHayesLaw> // Linked In<http://www..linkedin.com/company/1637160?trk=vsrp_companies_res_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A73953411380637906922%2CVSRPtargetId%3A1637160%2CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary> | www.leehayes.com

NOTE: This email and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Lee & Hayes, pllc, that is confidential and/or subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please do not read it or disclose it to others. Instead, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.