- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:59:58 +0000
- To: David Osumi-Sutherland <djs93@gen.cam.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Thanks for pointing this out. I added it to the errata list [1]. Regards, Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Errata On 10 Feb 2012, at 11:31, David Osumi-Sutherland wrote: > Hi all, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Annotations > > States: > > "Various OWL 2 syntaxes, such as the functional-style syntax, provide a mechanism for embedding comments into ontology documents. The structure of such comments is, however, dependent on the syntax, so these are simply discarded during parsing. In contrast, annotations are "first-class citizens" in the structural specification of OWL 2, and their structure is independent of the underlying syntax. " > > If it is true that functional syntax has a comment system, what is its syntax? I couldn't find any reference to it in the spec, and from this thread it looks like maybe there isn't one: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2011Mar/0004.html > > Cheers, > > David > > David Osumi-Sutherland, PhD > Ontologist > FlyBase / Virtual Fly Brain > Department of Genetics, > University of Cambridge, > Downing Street, > Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK > Tel: +44 (0)1223 333 963 > Fax: +44 (0)1223 766 732 > http://www.virtualflybrain.org > > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 22:00:26 UTC